آرشیو

آرشیو شماره ها:
۱۶

چکیده

وجود خطراتی مانند رشد سریع جمعیت، از بین رفتن زمین های کشاورزی و فضاهای باز، کمبود مسکن مناسب، افزایش نابرابری های اجتماعی بین مناطق شهری و روستایی و از بین رفتن حس تعلق به مکان در روستاها، کیفیت زندگی جوامع روستایی را مورد تهدید قرار داد و به دنبال آن زیست پذیری در کانون توجه قرار گرفت و رشد نمود. با توجه به اهمیت موضوع، پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی و ارزیابی میزان زیست پذیری مناطق روستایی انجام شده است. این پژوهش از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و بر اساس ماهیت توصیفی- تحلیلی است. جامعه آماری 18 روستای بخش مرکزی شهرستان فاریاب با 1170خانوار می باشد. حجم نمونه مورد مطالعه بر اساس فرمول کوکران 289 نفر برآورد گردید. پراکندگی تعداد نمونه ها در سطح روستاهای مورد مطالعه به صورت طبقه ای و بر اساس تعداد خانوار آنها می باشد. جهت تحلیل موضوع در بعد اجتماعی از شش شاخص در قالب 33 نماگر، در بعد اقتصادی در پنج شاخص در قالب 23 نماگر و در بعد محیطی از سه شاخص در قالب 10 نماگر بهره گرفته شد. روایی پرسشنامه توسط پانل صاحبنظران متخصص و مجرب مورد تأیید گردید. ضریب پایایی کل زیست پذیری بر اساس آلفای کرونباخ 87/0 محاسبه گردید. نتایج یافته ها بر اساس آزمون t تک نمونه ای بیانگر این است که میزان زیست پذیری روستاها در سطح ضعیفی قرار دارد و در تمام ابعاد زیست پذیری میانگین بدست آمده در سطح پایین تری از حد نرمال قرار دارد.

Measurement and Evaluation Livelihoods in rural areas Case study: villages of central part of Faryab city

There are dangers like rapid population growth, The destruction of farmland and open spaces, Lack of adequate housing, Increasing social inequalities between urban and rural areas And the loss of a sense of belonging in the villages, The quality of life in rural communities is threatened And then livelihoods has become the focus of attention and growth. according to imprtance of subject, current study, Aiming to evaluate The livelihoods of rural areas have been met. This research is of practical purpose And it is by descriptive-analytical nature. Statistical population of 18 villages of central part of Faryab city With 1170 households. The sample size was 289 people based on Cochran formula. The distribution of the number of samples in the studied villages is stratified and based on the number of households. To analyze the subject In the social dimension of six indicators in the form of 33 indicators, In the economic dimension in five indicators in the form of 23 indicators In the environmental dimension, three indicators were used in the form of 10 indicators. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by a panel of expert and experienced experts. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was calculated to be 0.87. The results based on the one-sample t-test indicate The rural livelihoods are poor And in all aspects of average viability, the mean is lower than normal. There are dangers like rapid population growth, The destruction of farmland and open spaces, Lack of adequate housing, Increasing social inequalities between urban and rural areas And the loss of a sense of belonging in the villages, The quality of life in rural communities is threatened And then livelihoods has become the focus of attention and growth. according to imprtance of subject, current study, Aiming to evaluate The livelihoods of rural areas have been met. This research is of practical purpose And it is by descriptive-analytical nature. Statistical population of 18 villages of central part of Faryab city With 1170 households. The sample size was 289 people based on Cochran formula. The distribution of the number of samples in the studied villages is stratified and based on the number of households. To analyze the subject In the social dimension of six indicators in the form of 33 indicators, In the economic dimension in five indicators in the form of 23 indicators In the environmental dimension, three indicators were used in the form of 10 indicators. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by a panel of expert and experienced experts. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was calculated to be 0.87. The results based on the one-sample t-test indicate The rural livelihoods are poor And in all aspects of average viability, the mean is lower than normal. There are dangers like rapid population growth, The destruction of farmland and open spaces, Lack of adequate housing, Increasing social inequalities between urban and rural areas And the loss of a sense of belonging in the villages, The quality of life in rural communities is threatened And then livelihoods has become the focus of attention and growth. according to imprtance of subject, current study, Aiming to evaluate The livelihoods of rural areas have been met. This research is of practical purpose And it is by descriptive-analytical nature. Statistical population of 18 villages of central part of Faryab city With 1170 households. The sample size was 289 people based on Cochran formula. The distribution of the number of samples in the studied villages is stratified and based on the number of households. To analyze the subject In the social dimension of six indicators in the form of 33 indicators, In the economic dimension in five indicators in the form of 23 indicators In the environmental dimension, three indicators were used in the form of 10 indicators. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by a panel of expert and experienced experts. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was calculated to be 0.87. The results based on the one-sample t-test indicate The rural livelihoods are poor And in all aspects of average viability, the mean is lower than normal. There are dangers like rapid population growth, The destruction of farmland and open spaces, Lack of adequate housing, Increasing social inequalities between urban and rural areas And the loss of a sense of belonging in the villages, The quality of life in rural communities is threatened And then livelihoods has become the focus of attention and growth. according to imprtance of subject, current study, Aiming to evaluate The livelihoods of rural areas have been met. This research is of practical purpose And it is by descriptive-analytical nature. Statistical population of 18 villages of central part of Faryab city With 1170 households. The sample size was 289 people based on Cochran formula. The distribution of the number of samples in the studied villages is stratified and based on the number of households. To analyze the subject In the social dimension of six indicators in the form of 33 indicators, In the economic dimension in five indicators in the form of 23 indicators In the environmental dimension, three indicators were used in the form of 10 indicators. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by a panel of expert and experienced experts. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was calculated to be 0.87. The results based on the one-sample t-test indicate The rural livelihoods are poor And in all aspects of average viability, the mean is lower than normal.

تبلیغات